Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 28
Filter
3.
J Ambul Care Manage ; 44(3): 184-196, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1165539

ABSTRACT

The 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic produced an abrupt and near shutdown of nonemergent patient care. Children's National Hospital (CNH) mounted a multidisciplinary, coordinated ambulatory response that included supply chain management, human resources, risk management, infection control, and information technology. To ensure patient access, CNH expanded telemedicine and instituted operational innovations for outpatient procedures. While monthly in-person ambulatory subspecialty visits decreased from 25 889 pre-COVID-19 to 4484 at nadir of the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine visits increased from 70 to 13 539. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of innovations in health care delivery and operations that the crisis prompted.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Hospital Planning , Hospitals, Pediatric/organization & administration , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Organizational Innovation , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine
4.
Chest ; 160(2): 671-677, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1163508

ABSTRACT

Survivors of COVID-19 are a vulnerable population, with complex needs because of lingering symptoms and complications across multiple organ systems. Those who required hospitalization or intensive care are also at risk for post-hospital syndrome and post-ICU syndromes, with attendant cognitive, psychological, and physical impairments, and high levels of health care utilization. Effective ambulatory care for COVID-19 survivors requires coordination across multiple subspecialties, which can be burdensome if not well coordinated. With growing recognition of these needs, post-COVID-19 clinics are being created across the country. We describe the design and implementation of multidisciplinary post-COVID-19 clinics at two academic health systems, Johns Hopkins and the University of California-San Francisco. We highlight components of the model which should be replicated across sites, while acknowledging opportunities to tailor offerings to the local institutional context. Our goal is to provide a replicable framework for others to create these much-needed care delivery models for survivors of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Aftercare/organization & administration , COVID-19 , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Survivors , COVID-19/therapy , Hospital Design and Construction , Humans , Time Factors
5.
Ann Ig ; 33(5): 410-425, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1076850

ABSTRACT

Methods: We hereby provide a systematic description of the response actions in which the public health residents' workforce was pivotal, in a large tertiary hospital. Background: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic has posed incredible challenges to healthcare workers worldwide. The residents have been affected by an almost complete upheaval of the previous setting of activities, with a near total focus on service during the peak of the emergency. In our Institution, residents in public health were extensively involved in leading activities in the management of Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic. Results: The key role played by residents in the response to Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic is highlighted by the diversity of contributions provided, from cooperation in the rearrangement of hospital paths for continuity of care, to establishing and running new services to support healthcare professionals. Overall, they constituted a workforce that turned essential in governing efficiently such a complex scenario. Conclusions: Despite the difficulties posed by the contingency and the sacrifice of many training activities, Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic turned out to be a unique opportunity of learning and measuring one's capabilities and limits in a context of absolute novelty and uncertainty.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Internship and Residency , Pandemics , Public Health Administration , Public Health/education , SARS-CoV-2 , Asymptomatic Infections , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19 Testing , Case Management/organization & administration , Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration , Emergency Medical Services/supply & distribution , Health Personnel , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient/prevention & control , Italy , Mass Screening , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Population Surveillance , Preoperative Care , Quarantine , Role , Self-Assessment , Software Design , Tertiary Care Centers/organization & administration , Workforce
9.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 196(12): 1080-1085, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-928408

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The described work aimed to avoid cancellations of indispensable treatments by implementing active patient flow management practices and optimizing infrastructure utilization in the radiation oncology department of a large university hospital and regional COVID-19 treatment center close to the first German SARS-CoV­2 hotspot region Heinsberg in order to prevent nosocomial infections in patients and personnel during the pandemic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study comprised year-to-date intervention analyses of in- and outpatient key procedures, machine occupancy, and no-show rates in calendar weeks 12 to 19 of 2019 and 2020 to evaluate effects of active patient flow management while monitoring nosocomial COVID-19 infections. RESULTS: Active patient flow management helped to maintain first-visit appointment compliance above 85.5%. A slight appointment reduction of 10.3% daily (p = 0.004) could still significantly increase downstream planning CT scheduling (p = 0.00001) and performance (p = 0.0001), resulting in an absolute 20.1% (p = 0.009) increment of CT performance while avoiding overbooking practices. Daily treatment start was significantly increased by an absolute value of 18.5% (p = 0.026). Hypofractionation and acceleration were significantly increased (p = 0.0043). Integrating strict testing guidelines, a distancing regimen for staff and patients, hygiene regulations, and precise appointment scheduling, no SARS-CoV­2 infection in 164 tested radiation oncology service inpatients was observed. CONCLUSION: In times of reduced medical infrastructure capacities and resources, controlling infrastructural time per patient as well as optimizing facility utilization and personnel workload during treatment evaluation, planning, and irradiation can help to improve appointment compliance and quality management. Avoiding recurrent and preventable exposure to healthcare infrastructure has potential health benefits and might avert cross infections during the pandemic. Active patient flow management in high-risk COVID-19 regions can help Radiation Oncologists to continue and initiate treatments safely, instead of cancelling and deferring indicated therapies.


Subject(s)
Appointments and Schedules , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Hospitals, University/organization & administration , Infection Control/organization & administration , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Pandemics , Radiation Oncology/organization & administration , Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Workflow , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19 Testing/statistics & numerical data , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Germany/epidemiology , Hospitals, University/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient/prevention & control , Neoplasms/surgery , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Personal Protective Equipment , Procedures and Techniques Utilization , Radiology Department, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Radiosurgery/statistics & numerical data , Radiotherapy/statistics & numerical data , Triage/methods , Triage/standards
10.
Ann Ital Chir ; 91: 345-351, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-875390

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The recent Sars-CoV2 pandemic has dramatically slowed patients' access to our clinic for vascular pathology when the contagion curve peaked. The need to restore the assistance activity has led us to adopt new individual prophylaxis and hygiene measures. METHODS: Doctors and staff must wear dedicated clothes. Mask and gloves are mandatory for patients. A visit is scheduled every 60 minutes to allow the sanitation of the rooms. The day before the visit patients are contacted by telephone for the Covid-19 risk triage. In the presence of symptoms the visit is postponed. In the presence of other risk factors a IgG/IgM Rapid Test for Covid-19 is performed on admission to the clinic. In the presence of fever, if an extraordinary rapid test cannot be performed, the visit must be postponed. Rapid test positive patients cannot be visited: they are placed in solitary confinement at their home waiting for a nasopharyngeal swab for Covid-19. When the rapid test is positive, immediate room sanitation also occurs. The rooms dedicated to the outpatient clinic as well as medical and not medical instruments are disinfected. CONCLUSION: The one adopted can be a useful management model for any type of care activity in order to guarantee the safety of patients and all the staff. KEY WORDS: COVID-19, Management, vascular, Outpatient clinic.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Cardiology/organization & administration , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Infection Control/methods , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Appointments and Schedules , Betacoronavirus/immunology , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Disinfection , Forms as Topic , Hospitals, University/organization & administration , Humans , Hygiene/standards , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Infection Control/organization & administration , Infection Control/standards , Italy/epidemiology , Nasopharynx/virology , Personal Protective Equipment , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , SARS-CoV-2 , Symptom Assessment , Thermometry , Triage/organization & administration
11.
Ann Ist Super Sanita ; 56(3): 365-372, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-789697

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: On 21 February 2020, Schiavonia Hospital (SH) detected the first 2 cases of COVID-19 in Veneto Region. As a result of the underlying concomitant spread of infection, SH had to rearrange the clinical services in terms of structural changes to the building, management of spaces, human resources and supplies, in order to continue providing optimal care to the patients and staff safety. The aim of this article is to describe how SH was able to adjust its services coping with the epidemiological stages of the pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three periods can be identified; in each one the most important organizational modifications are analyzed (hospital activities, logistical changes, communication, surveillance on HCW). RESULTS: The first period, after initial cases' identification, was characterized by the hospital isolation. In the second period the hospital reopened and it was divided into two completely separated areas, named COVID-19 and COVID-free, to prevent intra-hospital contamination. The last period was characterized by the re-organization of the facility as the largest COVID Hospital in Veneto, catching exclusively COVID-19 patients from the surrounding areas. CONCLUSIONS: SH changed its organization three times in less than two months. From the point of view of the Medical Direction of the Hospital the challenges had been many but it allowed to consolidate an organizational model which could answer to health needs during the emergency situation.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections , Hospitals, State/organization & administration , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Bed Conversion , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/transmission , Health Facility Closure , Hospital Communication Systems , Hospital Departments , Hospitals, State/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infection Control , Intensive Care Units , Italy/epidemiology , Nasopharynx/virology , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Organizational Policy , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Pandemics/prevention & control , Patient Isolation , Personal Protective Equipment , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Risk Management , SARS-CoV-2 , Workforce
13.
Injury ; 51(12): 2822-2826, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-764864

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 has had profound management implications for orthopaedic management due to balancing patient outcomes with clinical safety and limited resources. The BOAST guidelines on outpatient orthopaedic fracture management took a pragmatic approach. At Great Western Hospital, Swindon, a closed loop audit was performed looking at a selection of these guidelines, to assess if our initial changes were sufficient and what could be improved. METHOD: An audit was designed around fracture immobilisation, type of initial fracture clinic assessment, default virtual follow up clinic and late imaging. Interventions were implemented and re-audited. RESULTS: Initially 223 patients were identified over 4 weeks. Of these, 100% had removable casts and 99% did not have late imaging. 96% of patients were initially assessed virtually or had initial orthopaedic approval to be seen in face to face clinic. 97% had virtual follow up or had documented reasons why not. The 26 patients who were initially seen face to face were put through a simulated virtual fracture clinic. 22 appointments and 13 Xray attendances could have been avoided. We implemented a change of requiring all patients to be assessed at consultant level before having a face to face appointment. The re-audit showed over 99% achievement in all areas. CONCLUSION: Virtual fracture clinics, both triaging new patients and follow-up clinics have dramatically changed our outpatient management, helping the most appropriate patients to be seen face to face. Despite their limitations, they have been well tolerated by patients and improved patient safety and treatment.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Fractures, Bone/therapy , Orthopedics/organization & administration , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Aftercare/organization & administration , Aftercare/standards , Aftercare/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control/standards , England , Fracture Fixation , Fractures, Bone/diagnosis , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Health Plan Implementation , Humans , Medical Audit/statistics & numerical data , Office Visits/statistics & numerical data , Orthopedics/standards , Orthopedics/statistics & numerical data , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/standards , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics/prevention & control , Patient Safety , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Program Evaluation , Societies, Medical/standards , Telemedicine/standards , Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome
14.
BMJ Open ; 10(8): e039177, 2020 08 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-725772

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 started spreading widely in China in January 2020. Outpatient fever clinics (FCs), instituted during the SARS epidemic in 2003, were upgraded to serve for COVID-19 screening and prevention of disease transmission in large tertiary hospitals in China. FCs were hoped to relieve some of the healthcare burden from emergency departments (EDs). We aimed to evaluate the effect of upgrading the FC system on rates of nosocomial COVID-19 infection and ED patient attendance at Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH). DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 6365 patients were screened in the FC. METHODS: The FC of PUMCH was upgraded on 20 January 2020. We performed a retrospective study of patients presenting to the FC between 12 December 2019 and 29 February 2020. The date when COVID-19 was declared an outbreak in Beijing was 20 January 2020. Two groups of data were collected and subsequently compared with each other: the first group of data was collected within 40 days before 20 January 2020; the second group of data was collected within 40 days after 20 January 2020. All necessary data, including patient baseline information, diagnosis, follow-up conditions and the transfer records between the FC and ED, were collected and analysed. RESULTS: 6365 patients were screened in the FC, among whom 2912 patients were screened before 21 January 2020, while 3453 were screened afterward. Screening results showed that upper respiratory infection was the major disease associated with fever. After the outbreak of COVID-19, the number of patients who were transferred from the FC to the ED decreased significantly (39.21% vs 15.75%, p<0.001), and patients generally spent more time in the FC (55 vs 203 min, p<0.001), compared with before the outbreak. For critically ill patients waiting for their screening results, the total length of stay in the FC was 22 min before the outbreak, compared with 442 min after the outbreak (p<0.001). The number of in-hospital deaths of critically ill patients in the FC was 9 out of 29 patients before the outbreak and 21 out of 38 after the outbreak (p<0.05). Nineteen cases of COVID-19 were confirmed in the FC during the period of this study. However, no other patients nor any healthcare providers were cross-infected. CONCLUSION: The workload of the FC increased significantly after the COVID-19 outbreak. New protocols regarding the use of FC likely helped prevent the spread of COVID-19 within the hospital. The upgraded FC also reduced the burden on the ED.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Fever/virology , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Tertiary Care Centers/organization & administration , Workload , Adult , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , China/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Facilities and Services Utilization , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , Patient Transfer/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data
15.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 41(6): 102676, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-713795

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The current study aims at assessing the effectiveness of the guidelines set up by our clinic for the protection of patients and staff which enabled us to proceed with urgent and oncological surgery after the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our ENT department devised specific equipment to be worn by the staff for personal protection when dealing with Covid-19 patients both in aerosol generating and non-generating procedures. Moreover, restrictive measures were enforced both for the outpatient department and for the ward where only urgent practices were carried out and visitors were not allowed, while non-urgent elective surgery was postponed. A codified scheme was followed to perform tracheostomy procedure in Covid-19 positive testing patients on the part of 3 specific teams of 2 surgeons each, while the resident educational program was reorganized to limit the spread of the infection. RESULTS: In about a couple of months (from March 8th to May 3rd) a relevant amount of medical tests and surgical procedures were carried out on non COVID-19 patients and a certain number of tracheostomies were performed on COVID-19 patients. Consequently, all the ENT personnel were checked and found negative. Also, all the patients in the ward were swab tested and chest X-rayed, only one had a positive outcome and was adequately handled and treated. CONCLUSION: Our ENT guidelines regarding personal protection equipment and multiple simultaneous diagnostic procedures have proved to be an essential instrument for the management of patients with both known and unknown COVID-19 status.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Infection Control/organization & administration , Operating Rooms/organization & administration , Otolaryngology , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Hospital Departments , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures , Personal Protective Equipment , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Tracheostomy/methods
16.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 15(1): 279, 2020 Jul 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-671475

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: According to the required reorganization of all hospital activities, the recent COVID-19 pandemic had dramatic consequences on the orthopedic world. We think that informing the orthopedic community about the strategy that we adopted both in our hospital and in our Department of Orthopedics could be useful, particularly for those who are facing the pandemic later than Italy. METHODS: Changes were done in our hospital by medical direction to reallocate resources to COVID-19 patients. In the Orthopedic Department, a decrease in the number of beds and surgical activity was stabilized. Since March 13, it has been avoided to perform elective surgery, and since March 16, non-urgent outpatient consultations were abolished. This activity reduction was associated with careful evaluation of staff and patients: extensive periodical swab testing of all healthcare staff and swab testing of all surgical patients were applied. RESULTS: These restrictions determined an overall reduction of all our surgical activities of 30% compared to 2019. We also had a reduction in outpatient clinic activities and admissions to the orthopedic emergency unit. Extensive swab testing has proven successful: of more than 160 people tested in our building, only three COVID-19 positives were found, and of over more than 200 surgical procedures, only two positive patients were found. CONCLUSIONS: Extensive swab test of all people (even if asymptomatic) and proactive tracing and quarantining of potential COVID-19 positive patients may diminish the virus spread.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Orthopedics/organization & administration , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/statistics & numerical data , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Emergencies , Health Care Reform/organization & administration , Hospitalization , Humans , Infection Control/organization & administration , Italy/epidemiology , Orthopedic Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Surgery Department, Hospital/organization & administration
17.
CA Cancer J Clin ; 70(5): 349-354, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-642865

ABSTRACT

New York City has been at the epicenter of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic that has already infected over a million people and resulted in more than 70,000 deaths as of early May 2020 in the United States alone. This rapid and enormous influx of patients into the health care system has had profound effects on all aspects of health care, including the care of patients with cancer. In this report, the authors highlight the transformation they underwent within the Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology as they prepared for the COVID-19 crisis in New York City. Under stressful and uncertain conditions, some of the many changes they enacted within their division included developing a regular line of communication among division leaders to ensure the development and implementation of a restructuring strategy, completely reconfiguring the inpatient and outpatient units, rapidly developing the ability to perform telemedicine video visits, and creating new COVID-rule-out and COVID-positive clinics for their patients. These changes allowed them to manage the storm while minimizing the disruption of important continuity of care to their patients with cancer. The authors hope that their experiences will be helpful to other oncology practices about to experience their own individual COVID-19 crises.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematology/organization & administration , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Oncology Service, Hospital/organization & administration , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , Communication , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Hematology/methods , Humans , Medical Oncology/methods , New York City/epidemiology , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Patient Isolation , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine/organization & administration
19.
Orphanet J Rare Dis ; 15(1): 157, 2020 06 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-610299

ABSTRACT

Inherited heart disease represent a very heterogenous group of cardiac disorders, characterized by inherited, acquired, and often rare disorders affecting the heart muscle (cardiomyopathies) or the cardiac electrical system (ion channel disease). They are often familial diseases, and are among the leading cause of juvenile sudden death and heart failure. The aim of this paper is to give a perspective on how to run a clinical service during an epidemic or pandemic emergency and to describe the potential COVID-19 associated risks for patients affected by inherited heart diseases.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Cardiomyopathies/complications , Cardiomyopathies/genetics , Channelopathies/complications , Channelopathies/genetics , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Rare Diseases/complications , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine/organization & administration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL